Language structures

Many of the shifts a translator makes are not choices. They are the consequence of two languages being built differently, and the difference is describable. This section sets out the structural parameters along which languages vary, and connects each one to the techniques it forces on anyone translating across it. Language families are treated as illustrations rather than as the organizing principle: relatedness is a poor predictor of structure, since Turkish and Japanese are unrelated and behave alike while English and German are close relatives that diverge sharply.

Looking for what a translator does about it, for how the concept itself is designated, for the wording that was fixed in advance, or for what the target community expects? See Translation techniques or Terminology or Phraseology or Conventions.

Reference

Category

21 entries

Morphology and the word

How much grammatical work a single word does, and how words are built and written.

Clause architecture

How a clause is assembled: order, headedness, case, alignment and the means of subordination.

Nominal categories

The categories a noun phrase is obliged to express, and which a translator must therefore decide.

Verbal categories

What the verb is obliged to encode: time, aspect, evidence, voice, negation and person.

Discourse and lexicon

Parameters that operate above the clause or across the vocabulary as a whole.

Language pairs, understood structurally

Knowing which shifts a pair forces is what separates a defensible translation from a fluent one. It is the basis on which Translyta's language profiles are built.

Request a quote